Are Fitness Trackers Accurate? (The Truth About Calories Burned)

Are Fitness Trackers Accurate? (The Truth About Calories Burned)

Main Take-Aways:

  1. Put a different wearable on each wrist and you get two different readings. One fitness tracker be better at tracking heart rate, while the other does a better job at step count. However it seems that all fitness wearables, according to the research, have one thing in common: they suck at measuring energy expenditure.
  2. You can manage energy balance without tracking calories burned by controlling your food intake, tracking weight, measurements, and photos, and paying attention to your daily step count.
  3. Train to build muscle, get better, fitter, stronger, healthier. Track your heart rate during cardio sessions if you want, but try to avoid exercising just to burn more calories.

Are fitness trackers accurate or BS?

Although wearables like Whoop, Oura ring, FitBit, Garmin, etc. can be great for tracking stuff like heart rate, sleep duration, or step count..

.. you’d be surprised how inaccurate they turn out to be when it comes to how many calories you burn on a daily basis.

If you keep track of calories burned to rate your workouts or base your food intake on, then please make sure to read this one all the way through.

Because this might just be holding you back from reaching your goals.

Now I’m not here to bash fitness trackers by the way.

On the contrary, I believe there’s great use for them. Most of our clients wear them, and so do I. By all means, keep using yours if you have one!

But let’s see how accurate they really are, what this means for your nutrition and weight loss goals, how to use fitness trackers in a better way, and how you can progress without having to worry about how many calories you burn.

Table of Contents

How accurate are fitness trackers? Here’s what the research shows

Put a different wearable on each wrist and you get two different readings.

One may be better at tracking heart rate, while the other does a better job at step count. However it seems that all fitness wearables have one thing in common: they suck at measuring calories burned.

Here’s what the research has to say about the accuracy of fitness trackers.

A 2016 study [1] looked at the accuracy of the Apple Watch, Fitbit Charge HR, Samsung Gear S, and Mio Alpha to measure heart rate and energy expenditure. All four accurately measured heart rate, with a small error rate of 1-9%. However energy expenditure turned out to be 9-43% off

Then there was a 2020 systematic review [2] including wearables from Apple Inc, Empatica, Fitbit, Garmin, Jawbone, Mio, Misfit, Polar, Samsung, UnderArmour, Withings, and Xiaomi. Although there was a difference between brands, heart rate and step count turned out to be accurate. However this, again, was not the case for energy expenditure.

Now there is one issue when it comes to research and fitness trackers. And that’s the fact that by the time a study gets approved and published, there’s already a new generation of fitness trackers.

That being said, a more recent 2022 study [3] looked at more recently released wearables: Apple Watch 6, Polar Vantage V and Fitbit Sense. While they did fine at measuring heart rate (the Apple Watch winning that one), all three did NOT do well in terms of energy expenditure (average of 15-25% error).

Finally, a 2022 systematic review [4] came to the same conclusion. You see, even the newer fitness trackers can not be trusted if we’re talking calories burned.

Are Fitness Trackers Accurate? (The Truth About Calories Burned)

Why that’s a problem for weight loss

These inaccuracies might just be one of the reasons why many people struggle to lose weight even though they think they are in a caloric deficit.

Let’s say I want to lose weight and my fitness tracker tells me that I burn 4000 calories per day (which recently it did say by the way). I might want to start my weight loss phase at around 3500 calories.

Now what if in reality I burn 20% calories less than what my tracker says, and my TDEE is closer to 3200 calories? That would probably put me back at (the upper range of) my maintenance calories, if not even a slight surplus.

In this scenario, I would not lose any weight. Hell, I might even gain some.

The only way to REALLY know how many calories you burn would be in a lab setting. So assuming that you don’t live in a lab, let’s not worry about it 🙂

Using your fitness tracker the right way

Fitness trackers are getting better and better, and definitely have their time and place.

Sleep is the foundation of everything health and fitness. Since most devices at least do a good job with sleep duration, you can use them to track your sleep.

Personally I really like Whoop’s sleep journal function. It lets you track specific practices that you choose yourself. Then overtime the app shows you how these practices affect your sleep.

⇒ I’m not affiliated with Whoop, but I have been using it for years. If you’d like to try it out, feel free to click here get us both a free month!

Also the Oura ring does a good job at tracking sleep. It also tracks your body temperature, which can help women track ovulation.

Most fitness trackers seem to be best at tracking heart rate, which is why they can be very useful for cardiovascular training. If your goal is to train within a specific heart rate zone, go for it! Additionally you can also compare your sessions and track trends like time spent at a certain heart rate.

More wearables have also started to do HRV. And with that you’ll often get a ‘readiness’ or recovery score based on HRV plus a few other metrics.

But don’t let the data decide your mood for the day.

If you’re feeling great, but you have a low recovery score (or the other way around).. Who’s right? I’d say you probably know yourself better than anyone or anything else. This is why it can be a good idea to combine objective metrics with subjective metrics. AKA how you feel.

The most useful and important data point you can track is your daily step count. Although also here the trackers aren’t always 100% accurate, it is the most real-life measure that you can use to track your NEAT. As long as you use the same tracker, you have a consistent pulse on your daily movement.

⇒ Read more about Non-Exercise Activity, why it’s so important and how it can help you reach your goals.

Free all-inclusive fat loss nutrition guide

Wanna learn how to lose weight and keep it off too?

Get your FREE copy of ‘The Definitive Fat Loss Nutrition Guide’!

“Are Fitness Trackers Accurate? (The Truth About Calories Burned)”

How to manage energy balance without tracking calories burned

Energy balance will dictate whether you’ll lose, gain, or maintain weight. But just HOW are you supposed to know where you’re at if you’re missing half of the ‘calories in vs calories out’ equation?

It’s actually quite simple.

Control the amount of calories you eat and get as consistent as possible. Although you can do so via hand portion or plate methods, tracking macros will always be the most accurate.

Track your daily step count (Click To Read More About NEAT).

Keep track of your progress and pay attention to the long term, weekly trends. Weigh yourself at least three times a week to get an average, track measurements bi-weekly, and take monthly progress photos.

If you have a consistent food intake and you track your weight/measurements/photos, you will know exactly if you’re eating more/less/about the amount of calories that you expend per day.

Losing weight? That means that you are in a calorie deficit. You can now adjust accordingly to your goals. If that’s fat loss, try not to lose more than 1% of weight per week. Because that could lead to muscle loss, next level hangry-ness and not being able to stick to your deficit.

Gaining weight? You’re in a calorie surplus, adjust when you need to. If your goal is to gain muscle, avoid gaining more than 0.5% of weight per week so that you don’t gain unnecessary body fat.

Is your weight staying just about the same? That means you’re within your (current) maintenance calorie range. If that’s where you want to be, you may not have to change a thing.

Unless the amount of calories is far below your expected TDEE. If that’s the case, you might want to consider a reverse diet. That, or you need to get more consistent with your food intake. It’s very common to (subconsciously) under-report calories, which is why I’ll often bring this up with clients who get the feeling they’re ‘plateauing’.

Any adjustments can be made by increasing/decreasing either calories from food or daily steps. How much will depend on things like what season you’re in, rate of weight loss/gain, adherence, and more.

Are Fitness Trackers Accurate?


There’s a lot of amazing wearables out on the market, too many to discuss in a single blog post. But as much as there are differences between different brands, they all have that one thing in common.

When it comes to how many calories you burn on a daily basis, we just won’t know for sure.

And again, that’s totally ok.

Track your sleep, pay attention to your daily habits, and see what you can do to dial in your circadian rhythm. Better sleep = better everything!

Train to build muscle, get better, fitter, stronger, healthier. Track your heart rate during cardio sessions if you want, but try to avoid exercising just to burn more calories.

Bring your step count closer towards that 10.000-ish a day sweet spot for health and longevity.

And you’re going to be much better off 🙂


  1. Wallen, Matthew P et al. “Accuracy of Heart Rate Watches: Implications for Weight Management.” PloS one vol. 11,5 e0154420. 27 May. 2016, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154420
  2. Fuller, Daniel et al. “Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.” JMIR mHealth and uHealth vol. 8,9 e18694. 8 Sep. 2020, doi:10.2196/18694
  3. Hajj-Boutros, Guy et al. “Wrist-worn devices for the measurement of heart rate and energy expenditure: A validation study for the Apple Watch 6, Polar Vantage V and Fitbit Sense.” European journal of sport science, 1-13. 31 Jan. 2022, doi:10.1080/17461391.2021.2023656
  4. Germini, Federico et al. “Accuracy and Acceptability of Wrist-Wearable Activity-Tracking Devices: Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of medical Internet research vol. 24,1 e30791. 21 Jan. 2022, doi:10.2196/30791

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *